- Why couldn’t I tell the time correctly, what was the block there?
- How could I have known about West Side Story before viewing it on TV?
- Could it be that I was connecting with a parallel universe or reality?
- Is it possible that I was not wrong?
- Is it possible that I could not accurately “tell time” because time and space are relative and somehow I knew that?
Deidre Madsen
Living in this day
and age where there are so many obvious changes and shifts
on the planet through the weather upheavals, occupy movements, continual wars
throughout the globe, coupled with the emotional instability of many in the
nation, it is also true that many of us are waking up to something greater
within ourselves. Perhaps you, too, have had unexplained experiences with the paranormal,
time travel, out
of body experiences, and the like and wish there was a place to get some
answers. Following is a brief story and explanation of what is called a
“parallel” reality. It is my hope that this article and others on my site help
you understand the strange and mysterious.
West Side Story’s
Many Sides
When I was around
12 years old, the movie premiere of the critically acclaimed theatrical
production of “West
Side Story” with Natalie
Wood, Richard Beymer, Russ Tamblyn, and Rita Moreno, was set to air on
one of the local TV stations for the very first time. (This must have been in
the mid 60′s as the true USA premiere was in 1961 in New York City.) My
parents wanted the whole family to sit and watch the premiere together. They
were so excited, telling the five of us how much we will love this movie, how
wonderful it is, and ‘we are in for a treat.’ We were planning one of our
movie nights, sitting together on the dense wool carpeted floor of our living
room with our snacks of chips and cookies. My parents and the household
overall kept the momentum throughout the day in preparation for this major
event with one exception. Me.
Earlier in the day,
floods of memories and total recall that we had already viewed this film began
to fuel a strange dance between my parents and myself. Strangely, as I stood
there arguing with my parents this fact, I could recall the entire movie’s plot
line, visuals, story and dancing routines. Never having been to New York City
in my life to see the theatrical version, it was impossible for me to have
known this level of detail from the film. My parents were growing angrier and
angrier at my insistence and I was growing more and more irate and angry at
their lack of memory at their young ages. Truly, the concept that we had not
seen the film did not occur to me at the time. I only knew what was real and
true in my reality to me. The simple fact that they failed to remember this
‘monumental event’ was not my concern at the age of 12. After hearing over and
over the words “that’s impossible this is the world premiere” and “what is
wrong with you?”, the argumentative conversation finally dwindled to me
succumbing to their belief that I was completely wrong.
It
is time to cease caving into the limited tribal mindset around
the
paranormal world, and phenomena i.e.,
parallel
dimensional realities, time travel,
out
of body experiences, remote viewing, bi-location and so on.
Years later I
wondered if they thought I was going insane at that time of my life. During
the movie, after settling down and ‘behaving’ once again, I heard their minced
oath, “Thank
Goodness you have stopped all this nonsense.” This showed me they feared
something within me – perhaps a simple fear of the unknown – nonetheless I
knew it was not a safe place in which to explore these deeper inner mysteries
and it took several years before I came up with answers.
Telling Time
During that same
time period I had a mental block around being able to tell analog time.
(Digital clocks were non-existent in everyday households.) Coincidentally,
during this same period of time, after dinner Mom would clear the plates and I
was made to remain at the table and tell the time on the clock, a clock with
only four digits showing and carved out of a large strangely shaped lump of
wood covered with tons of glossy shellac. During this ritual I was repeatedly
asked to report the time in which I stammered and could not answer correctly.
My inability to tell the time was a growing concern for them as well. To this
day I still have difficulty looking at an analog clock and telling the time.
If someone asks me “What time is it?” I freeze up and look down at my watch
and if its analog I take this long pause before giving the time, and sometimes
I am incorrect.
Relative Questions
What has had me
wondering over the years, are two things:
These questions
created more questions:
Zone of
Consciousness
Regarding time in
and of itself (which by the way, is an interesting concept – time in and of
itself), could time be relative to which you-niverse we choose to exist in at
one time
singularity? Is there such a thing as a time singularity or present-tense?
Let alone a past-tense or future-tense? And if so, is it a type of zone of
consciousness, i.e., a time zone of consciousness, that we choose to accept as
our reality in the moment? And if no one else is there in the forest when a
tree falls, does it make a sound? An illuminating discourse is presented
through Mr. Michael Lockwood entitled The
Labyrinth of Time: Introducing the Universe where he states:
“When
looking up the subject of multiple universes I came upon the explanation: Multiverse: The multiverse
[or meta-universe (metaverse)] is the
hypothetical set of multiple possible universes (including our universe) that
together comprise all of reality. The different universes within the
multiverse are sometimes called parallel
universes. The structure of the multiverse, the nature of each universe
within it and the relationship between the various constituent universes,
depend on the specific multiverse hypothesis considered.” SOURCE:
WIKIPEDIA
Parallel universes
really do exist, according to a mathematical discovery by Oxford scientists
that sweeps away one of the key objections to the mind boggling and
controversial idea. Science
fiction looks closer to becoming science fact, reports Roger Highfield.
The work has wider
implications since the idea of parallel universes sidesteps one of the key
problems with time travel. Ever since it was given serious lab cred in 1949 by
the great logician Kurt
Gödel, many eminent physicists have argued against time travel because it
undermines ideas of cause and effect to create paradoxes: a time traveller
could go back to kill his grandfather so that he is never born in the first
place.
But the existence
of parallel
worlds offers a way around these troublesome paradoxes, according to David Deutsch of Oxford
University (whom I would love to meet one day), a highly respected proponent
of quantum theory, the deeply mathematical, successful and baffling theory of
the atomic world.
He argues that time
travel shifts between different branches of reality, basing his claim on
parallel universes, the so-called “many-worlds” formulation of quantum theory.
The new work
bolsters his claim that quantum theory does not forbid time travel.
“It does sidestep it. You go into another universe,” he said yesterday, though
he admits that there is still a way to go to find schemes to manipulate space
and time in a way that makes time hops possible.**
“Many sci-fi authors suggested time travel paradoxes
would be solved by parallel universes but in my work, that conclusion is
deduced from quantum theory itself”, Dr Deutsch said, referring to his
work on many worlds.
The mathematical
idea of parallel worlds was first glimpsed by the great quantum pioneer, Erwin
Schrodinger, but actually published in 1957 by Hugh Everett III,
when wrestling with the problem of what actually happens when an observation
is made of something of interest – such as an electron or an atom – with the
intention of measuring its position or its speed.
In the traditional brand of quantum mechanics, a
mathematical object called a wave function, which contains all possible
outcomes of a measurement experiment, “collapses” to give a single real
outcome.
“…
the universe is constantly and infinitely splitting,
so that no collapse takes place.”
Everett came up
with a more audacious interpretation: the universe is constantly and
infinitely splitting, so that no collapse takes place. Every possible outcome
of an experimental measurement occurs, each one in a parallel universe.
If one accepts
Everett’s interpretation, our universe is
embedded in an infinitely larger and more complex structure called the multiverse, which as a good approximation
can be regarded as an ever-multiplying mass of parallel universes.
Every time there is
an event at the quantum level – a radioactive atom decaying, for example, or a
particle of light impinging on your retina – the universe is supposed to
“split” into different universes.
A motorist who has
a near miss, for instance, might feel relieved at his lucky escape. But in a
parallel universe, another version of the same driver will have been killed.
Yet another universe will see the motorist recover after treatment in
hospital. The number of alternative scenarios is endless.
In this way, the “many worlds” interpretation of
quantum mechanics allows a time traveller to alter the past without producing
problems such as the notorious grandfather paradox.
“…there is infinite structure in what appears to be
chaos.”
But the “many
worlds” idea has been attacked, with one theoretician joking that it is “cheap
on assumptions but expensive on universes” and others that it is “repugnant to
common sense.” ["Common sense"[?] or perhaps “Divine Sense” as in,
“there is infinite structure in what appears to be chaos” i.e., chaos does not
exist, as there is only Z integer (or the Z – ion
(particle) … to me, this is the most simplest and most elegant of all
explanations. This, in my opinion, fits with Max Tegmark’s explanation
of the law of parsimony,
or Occam’s
Razor as it relates to multiple universes.]
Now new research
confirms Prof Deutsch’s ideas and suggests that Dr Everett, who was a Phd
student at Princeton University when he came up with the theory, was on the
right track.
Commenting in New
Scientist magazine, Prof. Andy Albrecht,
a physicist at the University of California, Davis, said of the link between
probability and many worlds: “This work will go down as one of the most
important developments in the history of science.”
Quantum
mechanics describes the strange things that happen in the subatomic world
– such as the way photons and electrons behave both as particles and waves. By
one interpretation, nothing at the subatomic scale can really be said to exist
until it is observed.
Until then,
particles occupy nebulous “superposition” states, in which they can have
simultaneous “up” and “down” spins, or appear to be in different places at the
same time.
According to
quantum mechanics, unobserved particles are described by “wave
functions” representing a set of multiple “probable” states. When an
observer makes a measurement, the particle then settles down into one of these
multiple options.
But the many worlds
idea offers an alternative view. Dr Deutsch showed mathematically that the
bush-like branching structure created by the universe splitting into parallel
versions of itself can explain the probabilistic nature of quantum outcomes.
This work was attacked but it has now had rigorous confirmation by David
Wallace and Simon Saunders, also at Oxford.
Dr Saunders, who
presented the work with Wallace at the Many Worlds at 50 conference at the
Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics in Waterloo, Canada, told New
Scientist: “We’ve cleared up the obscurities and come up with a pretty clear
verdict that Everett works. It’s a dramatic turnaround and it means that
people now have to discuss Everett seriously.”
Dr Deutsch added
that the work addresses a three-century-old problem with the idea of
probability itself, described by one philosopher, Prof David Papineau, as a
scandal. “We didn’t really know what probability means,” said Dr Deutsch.
There’s a
convention that it’s rational to treat it for most purposes as if we knew it
was going to happen even though we actually know it need not. But this does
not capture the reality, not least the 0.1 per cent chance something will not
happen.
“So,” said Dr
Deutsch, “the problems of probability, which were until recently considered
the principal objection to the otherwise extremely elegant theory of Everett
(which removes every element of mysticism and double-talk that have crept into
quantum theory over the decades) have now turned into its principal selling
point.” SOURCE:
TELEGRAPH UK
Occam’s Razor
Critics argue that
to postulate usually unobservable universes just to explain our universe seems
contrary to Occam’s
razor.
Tegmark answers:
“A
skeptic worries about all the information necessary to specify all those
unseen worlds. But an entire ensemble is often much simpler than one of its
members. This principle can be stated more formally using the notion of
algorithmic information content. The algorithmic information content in a
number is, roughly speaking, the length of the shortest computer program that
will produce that number as output. For example, consider the set of all
integers. Which is simpler, the whole set or just one number? Naively, you
might think that a single number is simpler, but the entire set can be
generated by quite a trivial computer program, whereas a single number can be
hugely long. Therefore, the whole set is actually simpler. Similarly, the set
of all solutions to Einstein’s
field equations is simpler than a specific solution. The former is
described by a few equations, whereas the latter requires the specification of
vast amounts of initial data on some hypersurface. The lesson is that
complexity increases when we restrict our attention to one particular element
in an ensemble, thereby losing the symmetry and simplicity that were inherent
in the totality of all the elements taken together. In this sense, the
higher-level multiverses are simpler. Going from our universe to the Level I
multiverse eliminates the need to specify initial conditions, upgrading to
Level II eliminates the need to specify physical constants,
and the Level IV multiverse eliminates the need to specify anything at all.”
He continues “A common feature of all four multiverse levels is that the
simplest and arguably most elegant theory involves parallel universes by
default. To deny the existence of those universes, one needs to complicate the
theory by adding experimentally unsupported processes and ad hoc postulates: finite space, wave function
collapse and ontological asymmetry. Our judgment therefore comes down to
which we find more wasteful and inelegant: many worlds or many words. Perhaps
we will gradually get used to the weird ways of our cosmos and find its
strangeness to be part of its charm.” SOURCE:
WIKIPEDIA
Relating to West Side Story… And Time
With this said,
then I indeed went through to a parallel universe or dimensional space/time
reality that had already happened a mere few minutes, hours, days or weeks
prior to the space/time event of the world premiere event of our family
watching West Side Story. In bringing back in to my current reality the full
memory recall of the different reality I was attempting to understand the
underpinnings of each reality I found myself connecting to and living within.
Clearly my
experience be’tween both worlds (just two of multiversal probabilities) left
me with many more questions for many years afterwards. Questions I am gaining
insight and answers to through my spiritual quest and path. What my family
ended up concluding about their reality-challenged daughter remains a mystery.
Perhaps they have had similar experiences and have thought about the West Side
Story experience.
…
in every equation you will discover one constant
red [blood - coding] thread and that is YOU.
In Closing
The reciprocal function, exhibiting hyperbolic
growth.
Perhaps a way to
look at how to traverse through realities is by looking at finite-time
singularity.
**A FINITE-TIME
SINGULARITY occurs when one input variable is time, and an output variable
increases towards infinite at a finite time. These are important inkinematics
and PDEs – infinites do not occur physically, but the behavior near the
singularity is often of interest. Mathematically the simplest finite-time
singularities are power laws for various exponents, x^{-\alpha}, of which the
simplest is hyperbolic growth, where the exponent is (negative) 1: x^{-1}.
More precisely, in order to get a singularity at positive time as time
advances (so the output grows to infinity), one instead uses
(t_0-t)^{-\alpha}(using t for time, reversing direction to -t so time
increases to infinity, and shifting the singularity forward from 0 to a fixed
time t_0).
By looking at the
diagram on the right, it reminds me of how we make a plus sign … +, by drawing
a vertical line and then a horizontal line through the middle. What if that is
incorrect and we must instead be drawing two 90° angles that may/may not intersect
in the middle? What if that is the correct pattern and the shift comes in the
center / zeropoint where we stop time/space and push it outward infinitely
until we shift the zero point “output” to where we wish for it to be. Isn’t
this the same thing that is written in the above example? If so then perhaps
in addition to manifesting our wildest dreams isn’t it quite possible that we
can also find the solution to Dr. Deutsch’s quest to discover how to hop time?
Whether you believe
in multiple universes, realities, realms, or dimensional options … in every
equation you will discover one constant red [blood-coding] thread and that is
YOU. And it is the discovery of YOU which can
make use of this information to further your own accelerated change towards
super-intelligence and allow the true Holy Grail to occur within your mind as
it fires off new neural net pathways creating an Arc of the Covenant from within. Achieving this space while remaining calm, grounded
and centered throughout your spiritual path and life creations, in the end, is
where we must gain our ground … for when we let go and let God … the how, when
and where manifests themselves to perfection.
In Service,
Deidre Madsen
About the Author
Deidre Madsen is a
tenured Imagery Consultant Deidre works body, mind and spirit whole-brained
holistic “Happily Inner After” retreats and sessions with clients worldwide
and assists in opening to your spirit-supra-consciousness.
DeidreMadsen.com
928-300-1236
Los Angeles
Sedona Seattle St. Louis
Deidre Madsen
Imagery Consultant,
Author, Lecturer,
Life Coach, P.I.
Psi Specialist
& Healer,
Minister, Ajne
Doctor,
& Radio Host of
BTR
Radio “Lightworkers
Corner
Pasted
from <http://www.riseearth.com/2014/07/multiple-universes-parallel-realities.html#.U9Vf6f4xRhw.facebook>
